Translations

Original Source: https://www.jeyamohan.in/202806/ Date: 2-Aug-2024   A malayalam journalist asked me what was I experiencing while writing Mudharkanal. 'How can it be remembered? Its memories would just be tiny droplets, it isn't a truth in anyway', I replied. 'Yes, but so is creative literature, isn't it? Mudharkanal is but a tiny droplet of what you had attained. A reader is able to travel from the linguistic structure to that fullness of experience through his imagination", he remarked. It felt true.  There wasn't any exuberance when writing Mudharkanal, for it had already been 25 years then since I had started reciting on my dream of writing Mahabharatha in entirety. My library was replete with books for that. The list of scholars, including P.K. Balakrishnan that I had visited for that sake is huge.  The list of journeys undertaken in the past twenty five years is more vast than that. But I kept postponing it. 'Maybe later' - a thought on one s...

Original Source: https://www.jeyamohan.in/197353/ Date: 21-Aug-2024   "Indiraneelam" is the second creation in Venmurasu novel portraying the story of Krishna. That way, it is rooted in Bhagavatham, outside of Mahabharatha. The Krishna of Mahabharatha is not a god, rather a great king possessing wisdom and worldly intuition in equal measure. It is only via external addendums that the portions establishing Krishna as a god got integrated in Mahabharatha. Bhagavatham is a creation that happened post the time when Krishna became a god. Is is therefore Bhagavatham and not Mahabharatha, that stands as a primary scripture for many Vaishnavaite traditions. During the creation of Venmurasu, I had a conundrum on how to depict Krishna. In several re-creations of Mahabharatha, Krishna is depicted solely as a king. In some of the creations, Krishna is depicted as a mere political strategist stripping Him of any wisdom. Example is M.T.Vasudevan Nair's "Irandaam Oozham" (...